Research Agenda & Beyond
The 'any2any' concept grew out of research in electronic
platforms, or ePlatform. ePlatforms are Web-based Net-enabled electronic environment where participants gathered to conduct, in our early discussion, eBusiness. We were concerned about the one-to-one label was not enough to convey our intended business model. Many-to-many would be ok yet it conveys a notion that the 'many' are known or part of a community or group. That is not it. The any-to-any term came up and it stuck. Yet, it is not crystalizedly clear of what it is. MySpace or Facebook is not any-to-any as they are all 'friends.' Twitter is that you are tweeted only if you follow. In a business environment, we want to collaborate (be it procurement or be it a supplier) on the basis if the partnership makes sense, that is, business sense. We give the definition next.
The nature of research of Any2Any Technologies,
Inc. will be trueful to the main theme of any-2-any, or any2any.
Of relationship realized between 2 or more parties, of not necessary fore-knowledge
of each others; in an electronic environment, the relationship bears the
trust nature of connectivity, interactivity, interoperability and integrability.
The research agenda is now detailed with respect to an ePlatform as shown in the figure below.
We will discuss each of the topics in details. Just click on each of the topics in the diagram above. We will expand the discussion on each of the topics gradually.
The applicability of the any2any concept covers, in our opinion, many industries and individual disciplines. We term these collectively
as subjects or subject matters. There are three areas that we are
quite interested in, namely, the hospitality industry, the logistics
industry, and the education community - mathematics as a start. We
briefly describe the last two next. Our main focus is the supply chain industry.
Logistics Industry and Supply Chain Industry
multi-modal logistcs services are not uncommon in the logistics
required by global trade. Coordination and Cooperation among
these services are often managed by an experienced forwarder,
or a 4th party (4PL) entity. A 4PL service provider leverages
the knowledge of 3rd party logistics (3PL) services providers,
single-mode transport handlers, customs, regulatory agents
and inspection agents to effect the logistics requirements
crossing company and country boundaries. We envision such
entity could exist in the electronic environment as an e-Platform,
or a 4th party logistics e-Plaform, where e-logistics services
are managed. This e-Platform must be able to support:
on-demand formation of e-logistics integrator based on ad
hoc collaborative logistics services - all information flow
effecting collaboration is online, Web-based and Internet-enabled,
validating and verifiable tracking, and end-to-end entity-based
tracing of physical and finance flow.
research addresses the need for a comprehensive Web-based environment
where mathematics education can be enhanced. Mathematics education
has felt the advent of information technology, especially the
Web technology for dissemination and sharing of information
in a group learning environment. The synergy between mathematics
and technology is well documented, with both pros and cons.
In here, we take on the view that the synergy is positive and
can be non-disruptive as far as the introduction of technology
into mathematics teaching, learning, exploring and assessment.
Yet, there are barriers identified clearly since the manipulation
of mathematics was not paramount in the continued development
of the Web. Much of the energy is geared towards the business
world. In here, we details the basic requirements to achieve
author-once-learn-anywhere (AOLA) delivery for mathematics education.
The e-Learning framework will be developed to guide the development
of a cyber mathematics community (CMC) where AOLA can be benefited
by teachers all over the world. Thus, in this report, we have
three major parts:
AOLA in Mathematics Education – Traditional mathematics
education commonly deliver lessons in paper and pencils,
each example has to be constructed and experimenting with
examples by students is restricted and slow. The capability
for teachers to author a lesson activity that can be used
anywhere yet provided the learning aspects for students
would be desirable. In this part, we will provide the
background what AOLA can offer and what is required to
reach that particular stage and the technical barriers
exist and innovation needed.
Technology Landscape for AOLA – In this part, a survey
on current and emerging technologies will be provided,
based on the needs of an AOLA e-Learning Framework.
Cyber Environment for AOLA – The third installment will
conclude the necessary and sufficient environment for
mathematics educators to rip the benefits identified in
the framework. This is due to the fact that we can harness
the power of the Internet to enhance the learning process
in mathematics education, creating a new dimension in
the learning process that we have to deal with.
This new word
'any2any' has been surfacing on the Web. We are not able to provide
a timeline at this time. We will list them out as they appear below
(from a perspective on July 2004; a Google search of 'any2any' on July 18, 2011).
a company that develops "software for Wireless, Embedded & Distributed
Systems, uses the any2any term in the product JCSP. This
is a company based in United Kingdom, with some kind of association
with the University of Kent, that began in 1999 (based on the
copyright statement). Their technology is based on a 'formal mathematical
model of computing' call CSP. In the description of JCSP, 'channel' creation is categorized as one2one, any2one,
one2any and any2any.
The enabling technology deals with (computer) process level communication,
not at business level of communication. CSP (Communicating Sequential
Process) is a classical concept by C.A.R. Hoare (CACM 21-8, Aug
- Another reference
to 'any2any' was in a presentation in 2002 about the misplaced
passion of the Web, and among other issues, that firewalls achieved
only of compartmentalizing trust relationships (inside company
and the outside world) but not "end-to-end any-to-any trust
relationships across boundaries." Yet, it was concluded that
'any2any trust models will emerge." In this IBM-related presentation,
the push is towards e-Business on demand with grip computing -
the OGSA (Open Grid Services Architecture) - an article written
in Augus 2003, and update October 2003, "A Visual Tour of
Open Grid Services Architecture" can be viewed at http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/grid/library/gr-visual/ (broken link) or here.
OGSA is under the corresponding working group in Global
- There are
other minor, not relevant to our discussion here, references to
the term any2any. For example, the 'any2any utilities' that link
up Windows and X-Windows (see www.brianweb.net/any2any/).
Interesting enough, based on the Google search (over 4,000,000 pages!), here are some highlights of the use of the term 'any2any', not in any particular order:
- Based on the presentation of Peter PijPelink titled "Any 2 Any concept", the term any2any was used to describe IBM's TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager) capabilities?
- An 'Any2Any' Windows software solution (Any2any 0.1) to allow a user to use a mouse and a keyboard for multiple computers.
- Bump into the website http://hqindex.net/
The following discussion was about 3 years old. Some are
still valid while there are trends out there that required
inclusion. We will come back to here later. [January
25, 2009; updated on July 17, 2011]
Technology that is vital for our technical consideratio. It is not meant to be exclusive. It is just what we can handle and are accustomed
to in our career path. We have the followin findings:
technology focus on Java is a simple choice of availability
and manageability. Further to that is the reason that
our company strategy targets enterprise mobility. The
EE and Java
ME platform seems, given what we do not know much
about other available platforms such as the .NET framework,
to fit our development needs. The enabling technology
behind our development thus relies heavily on Java technology,
with other supporting technoologies such as Perl, HTML,
which in turn acquired by Oracle on 27 January 2010 ),
technology has proliferated into many technology innovations
and adopted in many industries. The core technology such
as XSLT, Xlink, and XSchema remains key to different applicationsd.
We focus on enterprise applications that are mobility-aware
no doubt requires interoperability within enterprise's
individual applications, across companies and industries.
XML provides the baseline for information exchange - a
syntactic definition familiar to common HTML junkies,
and to SGML old timers. Its extensibility attracts creativity
that no existing information standards can compete with. We believe we would need to define a number of ontologies to complete the research picture, e.g., hotspot ontology and (privacy & security) entitlement ontology.
- Mobility (was titled Wireless Communication)
inherent need of any2any communication cannot exclude
the ability of any participant to effect a communication
channel anytime anywhere.
Communication with wireless technologies is becoming an
important element in business management. As e-Business
is taking hold in the business communities, management
on demand at anywhere anytime is a necessity more than
just as a added convenience. In here, we view wireless
communication in terms of these anylinks (new word): person-to-person
(or peer-to-peer), person-to-machine and machine-to-person,
and machine-to-machine. For machine-to-machine, WLAN will
be the main focus, of it development rather than applications
development. For other three anylinks, we will concentrate
on the communication via the mobile network, with possible
WLANs behind to further enhance the delivery of information
to machines, and vice versa.
sum, you will find how these technologies fit into our development
of any2any applications. As for the ePlatform infrastructure,
we are considering the discussion on cyberinfrastructure .
Recent developments point to the use of Ajax in the ePlatform
implementation will be weighted heavily. The choice of JMS
versus polling via Ajax remains unresolved at this writing
(january 26, 2009).